Elaboration of guideline for monitoring in relative bioavailability / pharmaceutical bioequivalence study by the sponsor / Elaboração de diretriz para monitoramento em biodisponibilidade relativa / estudo de bioequivalência farmacêutica pelo patrocinador / Elaboración de la directriz para el seguimiento en la biodisponibilidad relativa / estudio de bioequivalencia farmacéutica por parte del promotor

For registration of generic and similar drugs, it is necessary to carry out pharmaceutical equivalence (PE) tests and pharmaceutical bioequivalence (PB). To carry out these tests, duly qualified research centers are contracted, which need to be monitored by the sponsor who is legally responsible for the activities. To this end, it is the recommendation of the Document of the Americas, periodic monitoring to verify compliance with quality requirements, Standard Operating Procedures, Good Clinical Practices (GCP), Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), of the applicable regulatory framework, as well as of compliance with the study protocol. Thus, monitoring is a methodical and documented process to evaluate the degree of adhesion of the center to the planned design for the evaluation of the formulations. To this end, the implementation of a standardized and easily completed guideline is a very important tool to guarantee a consistent evaluation and maintain the organizational memory of the evaluated items by monitors designated by the sponsor, contributing to the constant improvement of the contracted centers and supporting traceability of the studies. This work provided a systemic view of the evidence process related mainly to pharmaceutical bioequivalence, with the monitoring guideline summarizing the items of greatest relevance to be verified.

Para registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares, é necessária a realização de testes de equivalência farmacêutica (EF) e bioequivalência farmacêutica (BF). Para a realização desses testes, são contratados centros de pesquisa devidamente habilitados, que precisam ser monitorados pelo patrocinador legalmente responsável pelas atividades. Há também a recomendação do Documento das Américas de realizar monitoramentos periódicos para verificar o cumprimento dos requisitos de qualidade, Procedimentos Operacionais Padrão, Boas Práticas Clínicas (BPC), Boas Práticas de Laboratório (BPL), de marco regulatório aplicável, bem como de cumprimento do protocolo do estudo. Assim, o monitoramento é um processo metódico e documentado para avaliar o grau de adesão do centro ao desenho planejado para a avaliação das formulações. Para tanto, a implantação de uma diretriz padronizada e de fácil preenchimento é uma ferramenta muito importante para garantir uma avaliação consistente e manter a memória organizacional dos itens avaliados por monitores designados pelo patrocinador, contribuindo para a melhoria constante dos centros contratados e apoiando rastreabilidade dos estudos. Este artigo forneceu uma visão sistêmica do processo de evidência relacionado principalmente à bioequivalência farmacêutica, com a diretriz de monitoramento resumindo os itens de maior relevância a serem verificados.

Para el registro de medicamentos genéricos y similares, es necesario realizar pruebas de equivalencia farmacéutica (EP) y de bioequivalencia farmacéutica (PB). Para llevar a cabo estas pruebas se contratan centros de investigación debidamente cualificados, que deben ser supervisados por el promotor, que es el responsable legal de las actividades. Para ello, es la recomendación del Documento de las Américas, el monitoreo periódico para verificar el cumplimiento de los requisitos de calidad, los Procedimientos Operativos Estándar, las Buenas Prácticas Clínicas (BPC), las Buenas Prácticas de Laboratorio (BPL), del marco regulatorio aplicable, así como del cumplimiento del protocolo del estudio. Así, la monitorización es un proceso metódico y documentado para evaluar el grado de adhesión del centro al diseño previsto para la evaluación de las formulaciones. Para ello, la implantación de una pauta estandarizada y de fácil cumplimentación es una herramienta muy importante para garantizar una evaluación consistente y mantener la memoria organizativa de los elementos evaluados por parte de los monitores designados por el promotor, contribuyendo a la mejora constante de los centros contratados y apoyando la trazabilidad de los estudios. Este trabajo proporcionó una visión sistémica del proceso de evidencia relacionado principalmente con la bioequivalencia farmacéutica, con la pauta de monitoreo que resume los ítems de mayor relevancia a ser verificados.

Quality Control Study of Different Products from Famotidine Tablets in the Iraqi Market / Estudio de Control de Calidad de Diferentes Productos de Tabletas de Famotidina en el Mercado Iraquí

Background: In developing countries, particularly in Iraq, the use of generic medicines has been increasing in recent years, primarily as a cost-saving measure in healthcare provision. In the Iraqi market, famotidine tablets are available from different pharmaceutical companies. As a result, regular pre-marketing quality testing is required to check the quality and identify which product might safely substitute the innovator product in the event of the innovator brand's unavailability or high cost. Objective: various quality control tests have been conducted to determine the Pharmaceutical Equivalence of the different generic and brands of Famotidine film-coated tablets marketed in Iraq. Materials and Methods: Four different samples of the most commonly available Famotidine 20 mg tablets in the Iraqi market were tested for drug contents, friability, and hardness. Additionally, the in-vitro drug release and kinetics were evaluated. Results: slight differences in the products' content were found; however, they were within the acceptable requirement of British Pharmacopeia (BP) and The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) 30, NF 25. Similarly, the friability and hardness were within the excellent range according to the B.P. and USP. The results of our study indicated that the tested brand (Famodin) and the three generic products (Famosam, Ulceran, and Famodar) of Famotidine tablets have a unique pattern of in-vitro release profiles. However, all the tested brands and generic pills complied with the USP specifications for the immediate release dosage forms except for Famosam. Release kinetic for the four tested products indicates first-order kinetic models. Conclusion: The findings revealed that nearly all of the tested Famotidine tablet brands and generics met the pharmacopeial requirements for oral tablets. As a result, if acquiring the innovative brand of famotidine tablets is difficult to obtain, healthcare providers may be advised to use the tested products instead

Antecedentes: En los países en vías de desarrollo, especialmente en Irak, el uso de medicamentos genéricos ha aumentado en los últimos años, principalmente como medida de ahorro en la prestación de servicios sanitarios. En el mercado iraquí, los comprimidos de famotidina están disponibles en diferentes empresas farmacéuticas. Por ello, es necesario realizar periódicamente pruebas de calidad previas a la comercialización para comprobar la calidad e identificar qué producto podría sustituir con seguridad al producto innovador en caso de que éste no esté disponible o tenga un coste elevado. Objetivo: se han realizado varias pruebas de control de calidad para determinar la Equivalencia Farmacéutica de los diferentes genéricos y marcas de Famotidina comprimidos recubiertos con película comercializados en Irak. Materiales y métodos: Se analizaron cuatro muestras diferentes de los comprimidos de 20 mg de Famotidina más comunes en el mercado iraquí para determinar el contenido de fármaco, la friabilidad y la dureza. Además, se evaluó la liberación in-vitro del fármaco y su cinética. Resultados: Se encontraron ligeras diferencias en el contenido de los productos; sin embargo, estaban dentro de los requisitos aceptables de B.P. y de la Farmacopea de Estados Unidos (USP) 30, NF 25. Así mismo, la friabilidad y la dureza estaban dentro del rango excelente según la B.P. y la USP. Los resultados de nuestro estudio indicaron que la marca probada (Famodin) y los tres productos genéricos (Famosam, Ulceran y Famodar) de comprimidos de famotidina tienen un patrón único de perfiles de liberación in-vitro. Sin embargo, todas las marcas y los comprimidos genéricos probados cumplieron con las especificaciones de la USP para las formas farmacéuticas de liberación inmediata, excepto Famosam. La cinética de liberación de los cuatro productos probados indica modelos cinéticos de primer orden. Conclusiones: Los resultados revelaron que casi todas las marcas y genéricos de comprimidos de Famotidina probados cumplían los requisitos farmacopeicos para los comprimidos orales. En consecuencia, si resulta difícil adquirir la marca innovadora de comprimidos de famotidina, se puede aconsejar a los profesionales sanitarios que utilicen los productos probados en su lugar

Mudanças recentes e continuidade da dependência tecnológica e econômica na indústria farmacêutica no Brasil / Recent changes and continuity of technological and economic dependency in the pharmaceutical industry in Brazil / Cambios recientes y continuidad de la dependencia tecnológica y económica en la industria farmacéutica en Brasil

Este artigo apresenta os resultados de pesquisa sobre a indústria farmacêutica no Brasil, no período recente, realizada no âmbito do projeto multicêntrico Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde, Inovação e Dinâmica Capitalista: Desafios Estruturais para a Construção do Sistema Universal de Saúde no Brasil. Os quatro componentes estudados sobre a evolução da indústria farmacêutica no Brasil foram: as políticas industriais do Estado; as mudanças na composição financeira e patrimonial das empresas de capital nacional, a evolução da produção; e o comportamento da balança comercial. As análises levaram em consideração o marco teórico proposto por Luiz Filgueiras e Reinaldo Gonçalves a respeito da implantação de um "modelo liberal e periférico" na economia brasileira a partir dos anos 1990. Foram levantados e analisados dados sobre: a situação das Parcerias de Desenvolvimento Produtivo (PDP) para medicamentos entre 2009 e 2020; da Pesquisa Industrial Anual (PIA), do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), entre 1996 e 2018; e os dados da evolução da balança comercial do setor entre 1996 e 2019. Os resultados evidenciam que a agenda do Estado para o setor favoreceu o crescimento da produção de medicamentos genéricos, dos medicamentos isentos de prescrição (MIP) e deu início a alguns projetos de transferência de tecnologia via PDPs para a produção de medicamentos biológicos e sintéticos. Apesar dessa evolução, o Brasil se mantém dependente da importação de insumos químicos e farmacêuticos e de medicamentos acabados. Isto nos mantém em situação de vulnerabilidade tecnológica e econômica em relação aos fornecedores mundiais, além de um aprofundamento do déficit da balança comercial do setor.

This article presents the results of a study on the pharmaceutical industry in Brazil in the recent period, as part of the multicenter project Health Economic-Industrial Complex, Innovation and Capitalist Dynamics: Structural Challenges for Construction of the Universal Health System in Brazil. The four components studied in the evolution of the Brazilian pharmaceutical industry were: State industrial policies; changes in the financial and shareholding composition of companies with domestic capital; trends in production; and trade balance behavior. The analyses considered the theoretical framework proposed by Luiz Filgueiras and Reinaldo Gonçalves concerning the implementation of a "liberal and peripheral model" in the Brazilian economy since the 1990s. Data were collected and analyzed on the situation with the Product Development Partnerships (PDP) for medicines from 2009 to 2020 from the Annual Industrial Survey (PIA) of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) from 1996 to 2018 and data on the evolution of the sector's trade balance from 1996 to 2019. The results show that the State's agenda for the sector favored the growth in production of generic drugs and over-the-counter drugs and started some technology transfer projects via PDPs for production of biological and synthetic drugs. Despite this evolution, Brazil is still dependent on the importation of chemical and pharmaceutical inputs and finished drugs. This keeps Brazil in a situation of technological and economic vulnerability in relation to global suppliers, besides a growing trade deficit in the sector.

Este artículo presenta los resultados de investigación sobre la industria farmacéutica en Brasil, durante el período reciente, realizada en el ámbito del proyecto multicéntrico Complejo Económico-Industrial de la Salud, Innovación y Dinámica Capitalista: Desafíos Estructurales para la Construcción del Sistema Universal de Salud en Brasil. Los cuatro componentes estudiados sobre la evolución de la industria farmacéutica en Brasil fueron: las políticas industriales del Estado; los cambios en la composición financiera y patrimonial de las empresas de capital nacional, la evolución de la producción; y el comportamiento de la balanza comercial. Los análisis tuvieron en consideración el marco teórico propuesto por Luiz Filgueiras y Reinaldo Gonçalves, respecto a la implantación de un "modelo liberal y periférico" en la economía brasileña, a partir del año 1990. Se recabaron y analizaron datos sobre: la situación de las Colaboraciones de Desarrollo Productivo (PDP por su sigla en portugués) para medicamentos entre 2009 y 2020; de la Encuesta Industrial Anual (PIA), del Instituto Brasileño de Geografía y Estadística (IBGE), entre 1996 y 2018; y los datos de la evolución de la balanza comercial del sector entre 1996 y 2019. Los resultados evidencian que la agenda del Estado para el sector favoreció el crecimiento de la producción de medicamentos genéricos, de los medicamentos exentos de prescripción (MIP) y comenzó algunos proyectos de transferencia de tecnología vía PDPs para la producción de medicamentos biológicos y sintéticos. A pesar de esa evolución, Brasil sigue siendo dependiente de la importación de insumos químicos y farmacéuticos y de medicamentos acabados. Esto nos mantiene en una situación de vulnerabilidad tecnológica y económica, en relación con los proveedores mundiales, además de una profundización del déficit de la balanza comercial del sector.

Interchangeability among carbamazepine formulations: the impact over epilepsy patients

Abstract The treatment of epilepsy is complex and a matter of concern is the interchangeability among different formulations available for antiepileptic drugs. To evaluate the effects of interchangeability among carbamazepine formulations on patients with epilepsy. This is a prospective cohort study that included adult outpatients diagnosed with epilepsy and under pharmacological treatment with carbamazepine. Before switching the brand/manufacturer, the "Interchangeable Pharmaceutical Product in the Treatment of Epilepsies" questionnaire was applied. The questionnaires "Adverse Events Profile" and Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31, so as the plasma carbamazepine concentrations, were evaluated before and after the brand/ manufacturer switch. Physical-chemical tests aiming to assess tablets quality were performed in accordance with the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia 5th edition. The study population was composed by 14 patients (mean age: 44.6 years), with 10 of females. From those interviewed, 10 had no knowledge about the three antiepileptic drugs formulations available. The frequency of adverse event "problems with skin" incresead (p=0.023) and "upset stomach" decreased (p=0.041) after the changeover. The adverse events profile was associated with only two quality of life domains: "energy/fatigue" (p=0.048) and "total score" (p=0.018). Divergent results between generic and reference formulations were observed in purity-water test (reference: 1.96%, generic: 4.84%) and dissolution test, in which the generic formulation presented 66.27 to 85.77% of carbamazepine dissolved after the third level. Conclusions: Objective differences before and after the brand/manufacturer switch were not observed, in spite of patients' perceptions. Despite that, more studies in the field are necessary, especially on the interchangeability among generic antiepileptics, in order to better elucidate switching consequences on patients' life.

Comparativo entre preço máximo ao consumidor de medicamentos e preços praticados na internet no Brasil: desalinhamentos e distorções regulatórias / Comparison between maximum consumer prices for medicines and prices practiced on the internet in Brazil: misalignments and regulatory distortions

Resumo Desde 2003, a Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos (CMED) é responsável por estabelecer o preço máximo ao consumidor (PMC) para medicamentos. O objetivo deste estudo é comparar preços praticados na internet com o PMC e verificar como se dá a diferença média de preços entre eles no mercado em dois segmentos de medicamentos existentes no Brasil, os de referência e os genéricos. Foi realizada uma coleta de preços de medicamentos em sítios eletrônicos de farmácias e drogarias e os preços coletados foram comparados com os seus respectivos PMCs para o ano de 2019. Foram analisados 68 fármacos e 268 apresentações comerciais de medicamentos genéricos e de referência relativas a esses fármacos. Observou-se um padrão distinto para a diferença média de preços praticados em relação ao PMC em cada segmento de mercado, sendo que, em sua maioria, os genéricos tendiam a praticar as maiores diferenças e os de referência as menores diferenças. O problema da distorção dos preços praticados em relação ao PMC apontados pela literatura foi confirmado principalmente em relação ao mercado de genéricos. Conclui-se que seria importante uma revisão periódica do PMC levando em conta os preços praticados no varejo.

Abstract Since 2003, the Medicine Market Regulation Chamber (CMED, in portuguese) has been responsible for establishing the maximum consumer prices (MCP) for medicines. The aim of this study is to compare prices practiced on the internet with the MCP and identify the average price difference between them in two segments of existing drugs in Brazil, the reference and the generic ones. Drug prices were collected on websites of pharmacies and drugstores and compared with their respective MCP for the year 2019. The analysis included 68 drugs and 268 commercial presentations of generic and reference drugs related to these drugs. A different pattern was observed for the average price difference in relation to the MCP in each market segment, with most generic drugs tending to show the highest differences and the reference drugs the lowest ones. The problem of price distortion in relation to the MCP pointed out by the literature was confirmed mainly in relation to the generic drug market. It was concluded that a periodic review of the MCP would be important, considering retail prices.

Pharmaceutical procurement among public sector procurers in CARICOM / Compras farmacéuticas por parte de organismos del sector público de CARICOM / Aquisição de produtos farmacêuticos por compradores do setor público da CARICOM

ABSTRACT Objective. To examine multiple aspects of the medicines in CARICOM procurement markets, including manufacturer headquarters location, regulatory history, and type (innovator versus generic); the proportion of World Health Organization (WHO) essential medicines; and the most expensive medicines procured. Methods. An analysis of procurement information from selected CARICOM procurers. Four public sector procurement lists were obtained based on public availability or sharing of data from public sector procurers. Analyses were based on parameters available or deduced from these data. Results. The majority of products come from manufacturers headquartered in North America and Europe (63%-67%). The percentage of medicines procured from generic companies is 60%-87%; and 25%-50% of medicines procured are on the WHO Essential Medicines List. Wide price variations exist in the most expensive medicines purchased. Conclusions. The analysis identifies vulnerabilities and opportunities in the procurement situation of CARICOM states, particularly related to quality and rational use of medicines. This analysis represents a baseline that governments and other stakeholders can use in the future.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Revisar los múltiples aspectos de los medicamentos en los mercados de compras y los proveedores de CARICOM, como la ubicación de la sede del fabricante, el historial de regulación, el tipo (patentado versus genérico); la proporción de medicamentos esenciales de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS); y los medicamentos comprados más caros. Métodos. Se analizó información sobre la compra por parte de determinados organismos de CARICOM. La información procedía de cuatro listas de organismos del sector público que realizan las compras, que se consiguieron en función de su disponibilidad pública o de los datos distribuidos por los organismos del sector público que realizan las compras. Los análisis estaban basados en los parámetros disponibles o derivados de estos datos. Resultados. La mayoría de los productos proviene de fabricantes radicados en América del Norte y Europa (entre 63% y 67%). El porcentaje de medicamentos que se compra de empresas genéricas oscila entre 60% y 87%; y de 25% a 50% de los medicamentos que se compran están en la Lista de Medicamentos Esenciales de la OMS. Hay una gran divergencia de precios entre los medicamentos comprados más caros. Conclusiones. En el análisis se han encontrado vulnerabilidades y oportunidades con respecto a la situación de las compras de medicamentos de los Estados de CARICOM, especialmente en cuanto a la calidad y al uso racional de los medicamentos. Este análisis representa una línea de base que los gobiernos u otros interesados directos pueden utilizar en el futuro.

RESUMO Objetivo. Examinar vários aspectos relacionados aos mercados e fornecedores de produtos farmacêuticos da CARICOM, incluindo a localização da sede do laboratório fabricante, histórico regulatório e tipo de produtos (inovadores versus genéricos); proporção de medicamentos adquiridos que constam da relação de medicamentos essenciais da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS); e medicamentos mais caros comprados. Métodos. Foi realizada uma análise de informação sobre compras feitas por compradores selecionados da CARICOM. Quatro listas de compras do setor público foram obtidas com informação de acesso público ou compartilhada pelos compradores. As análises foram feitas com base em parâmetros disponíveis ou inferidos a partir dos dados. Resultados. A maioria dos produtos farmacêuticos é proveniente de laboratórios com sedes na América do Norte e Europa (63%-67%). Do total, 60%-87% dos medicamentos adquiridos são de laboratórios de produtos genéricos e 25%-50% constam da relação de medicamentos essenciais da OMS. Existe uma ampla variação nos preços dos medicamentos mais caros comprados. Conclusões. Foram identificadas fragilidades e oportunidades na situação de compras dos países da CARICOM, em particular relacionadas à qualidade dos produtos e ao uso racional dos medicamentos. Esta análise serve de referência a ser usada futuramente pelos governos e outras partes interessadas.

Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

BACKGROUND@#Generic drugs are bioequivalent to their brand-name counterparts; however, concerns still exist regarding the effectiveness and safety of generic drugs because of small sample sizes and short follow-up time in most studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term antihypertensive efficacy, cost-effectiveness and cardiovascular outcomes of generic drugs compared with brand-name drugs.@*METHODS@#In a multicenter, community-based study including 7955 hypertensive patients who were prospectively followed up for an average of 2.5 years, we used the propensity-score-matching method to match the patients using brand-name drugs to those using generic drugs in a ratio of 1:2, 2176 patients using brand-name drugs and 4352 patients using generic drugs.@*RESULTS@#There were no significant differences between generic drugs and brand-name drugs in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy, BP control rate, and cardiovascular outcomes including coronary heart disease and stroke. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of systolic BP (SBP)-lowering was -7.9 mmHg (95% CI, -9.9 to -5.9) in the brand-name drug group and -7.1 mmHg (95% CI, -9.1 to -5.1) in the generic drug group after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, number of antihypertensive drugs and traditionally cardiovascular risk factors. Among patients aged <60 years, brand-name drugs had a higher BP control rate (47% vs. 41%; P = 0.02) and a greater effect in lowering SBP compared with generic drugs, with the between-group difference of 1.5 mmHg (95% CI, 0.2-2.8; P = 0.03). BP control rate was higher in male patients using brand-name drugs compared with those using generic drugs (46% vs. 40%; P = 0.01). Generic drugs treatment yielded an average annual incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $315.4 per patient per mmHg decrease in SBP compared with brand-name drugs treatment.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Our data suggested that generic drugs are suitable and cost-effective in improving hypertension management and facilitating public health benefits, especially in low- and middle-income areas.

Percepción y uso de medicamentos genéricos en médicos en formación de una universidad mexicana / Perception and use of generic drugs in medical students at a Mexican university

INTRODUCCIÓN: la formación que reciben los médicos es fundamental para su futuro como profesionales; ideas erróneas sobre los medicamentos genéricos pueden influir negativamente en su prescripción. OBJETIVO: identificar la percepción y el uso de medicamentos genéricos de médicos en formación. MÉTODOS: estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo y transversal, realizado en estudiantes de medicina de una Universidad Pública del Sureste de México. La población de estudio se conformó por una muestra depurada de 522 estudiantes matriculados durante el periodo escolar febrero-junio de 2020, quienes mediante convocatoria abierta llenaron un formulario (Google Forms) tipo escala de Likert. RESULTADOS: la apreciación de los estudiantes hacia un medicamento de patente es superior, tendiendo a una mayor fiabilidad en casos de gravedad. Los medicamentos genéricos son vistos como de mala calidad y se tiene la creencia de que los existentes en el mercado son piratas o copias ilegales. CONCLUSIÓN: los resultados sugieren que los médicos en formación tienen una percepción negativa hacia las Especialidades Farmacéuticas Genéricas, las consideran menos eficaces y de calidad dudosa. Pese a esta consideración, los genéricos suelen ser usados en padecimientos leves y refieren obtener buenos resultados.

INTRODUCTION: the medical education receive is critical to their professional future. Misconceptions about generic drugs can negatively influence your prescription. OBJECTIVE: identify the perception and use of generic drugs in trained physicians. METHODS: quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study carry out in medical students at a public university in southeastern Mexico. The study population consisted of a purified sample of 522 students enrolled during the February-June 2020 school year, who by open call filled out a Likert scale form (Google Forms). Results: Students' appreciation of a patent drug is superior, taking into account greater reliability in cases of seriousness. Generic drugs are seen as of poor quality and it is believed that those on the market are pirates or illegal copies. CONCLUSIONS: the results suggest that trained physicians have a negative perception of Generic Pharmaceutical Specialties, considering them less effective and of dubious quality. Despite this consideration, generics are often used in mild conditions and refer good results.

Estimación del ahorro hospitalario con el reemplazo de inmunosupresores genéricos en trasplante renal / Cost savings after switching from innovative tacrolimus to a generic version of the drug in transplant recipients

Background The use of narrow therapeutic index generic immunosuppressant in solid organ transplantation is controversial. Most experiences switching to these drugs have short term follow-up periods, analyze only pharmacokinetic issues and do not systematically include either complications or cost analyses. Aim To analyze the costs and benefits of switching our kidney transplant recipients from innovative tacrolimus to a generic version of the drug. Material and Methods Fifty-seven stable transplant recipients were switched from innovative tacrolimus to a generic version of the drug, maintaining the same dose. They were followed for eight months recording all events during such period. Results We observed two infectious episodes, five allograft biopsies were performed and two patients had acute rejections. Conclusions From the payer's perspective, if all the costs associated with the change to generic tacrolimus are considered, savings related to a lower cost of the drug translate in a real financial loss for the public health system. The analysis also showed that frequent switches, even from one generic drug to a cheaper one is an even worse strategy to save money.

La sostenibilidad del sistema de salud y el mercado farmacéutico: Una interacción permanente entre el costo de los medicamentos, el sistema de patentes y la atención a las enfermedades / The sustainability of the health system and the pharmaceutical market: A permanent interaction between the cost of medications, the patent system, and disease care

RESUMEN Ante la amenaza latente de futuras pandemias, este estudio tiene como objetivo analizar -desde el eje de los medicamentos- la sostenibilidad del sistema sanitario, la cobertura, la eficiencia del gasto y su vinculación al sistema de patentes farmacéuticas. En este marco, el sistema de patentes farmacéuticas adquiere un papel determinante, dado que fomentar su existencia estimula la producción de investigación pero, a su vez, su existencia no suscita un rápido avance, debido al desarrollo legislativo protector que han tenido las patentes y que ha dado lugar a un acomodamiento de la industria. Como la industria farmacéutica ha conseguido extender la duración de patentes y evitar la incorporación de genéricos, se analiza la influencia de las patentes farmacéuticas que ha dado lugar a reflexionar acerca de la posibilidad de consorciar esfuerzos realizando alianzas entre varias empresas y el sector público para afrontar los retos que plantean nuevas enfermedades producidas por virus que dan lugar a epidemias y pandemias.

ABSTRACT Taking into account the latent threat of future pandemics, the objective of this study is to analyze - particularly with respect to medications - the sustainability of the health system, healthcare coverage, budgetary efficiency, and connections with the pharmaceutical patent system. In this context, the pharmaceutical patent system acts as a determining factor, given that promoting its existence stimulates the production of research, but in turn its existence stands in the way of rapid advancements, primarily due to the development of protective legislation concerning patents, which has largely accommodated the industry. Given that the pharmaceutical industry has managed to extend the duration of patents and avoid the incorporation of generics, our analysis focuses on the influence of pharmaceutical patents; this influence has led to reflection on the possibility of combining efforts by forging alliances between numerous companies and the public sector in order to face the challenges posed by new diseases caused by viruses that give rise to epidemics and pandemics.

O custo da extensão da vigência de patentes de medicamentos para o Sistema Único de Saúde / The cost to the Brazilian Unified National Health System of the extension of drug patent terms / El coste para el Sistema Único de Salud de Brasil de la extensión de la vigencia de patentes de medicamentos

Resumo: O parágrafo único do art. 40 da Lei de Propriedade Industrial brasileira estabelece a extensão de vigência de patentes pela mora do exame, ao menos, até dez anos a partir da concessão. Pensado como exceção, esse dispositivo tornou-se a regra no caso das patentes farmacêuticas, prolongando o prazo de exclusividade de exploração de medicamentos. Isso impacta o consumo privado e o orçamento do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Este trabalho investiga o custo, para o SUS, da extensão de vigência de nove medicamentos, por ser proibida a compra de versões genéricas ou biossimilares. Foram analisados três grupos: (a) quatro já em extensão; (b) três que, com a concessão das patentes, terão extensão; e (c) dois com patentes mailbox que estão em domínio público, mas que podem ter a extensão garantida judicialmente. A partir de valores unitários e quantidades totais de compra pelo Departamento de Logística em Saúde do Ministério da Saúde (DLOG), foi estimado um gasto total de R$ 10,6 bilhões com os nove medicamentos entre 2014 a 2018. Assim, foi projetado o gasto total nos respectivos períodos de extensão: R$ 6,8 bilhões. Uma busca de mercado por preços de alternativas genéricas retornou uma redução potencial de R$ 1,2 bilhão para o gasto do DLOG com apenas quatro medicamentos. Por fim, com base nas reduções mínimas, médias e máximas do mercado, foi encontrada uma economia potencial de até R$ 3,9 bilhões no gasto do DLOG com a compra dos nove medicamentos, se não houvesse o dispositivo de extensão de vigência.

Abstract: The sole paragraph of Article 40 of the Brazilian Industrial Property Law determines the extension of the patent term in case of delayed prosecution, guaranteeing 10 years of protection from grant. Originally conceived as an exception, this provision became the rule in the case of drug patents, prolonging period of exclusive exploitation. This situation impacts both the out-of-pocket spending by families and the budget of the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS). This study explores the cost to SUS of extending the patent term for nine drugs, which delays the launch of generic or biosimilar alternatives. Three groups were analyzed: (a) four patents already extended; (b) three that will be extended if granted; and (c) two drugs with mailbox patents that are in the public domain, but that may have the extension granted by court order. Based on the unit values and the total amounts of purchases by the Logistics Department of the Ministry of Health (DLOG), a total expenditure of BRL 10.6 billion on the nine drugs from 2014 to 2018 was estimated. The total projected expenditure for the respective extension periods was thus BRL 6.8 billion. A market price search for generic alternatives yielded potential savings of BRL 1.2 billion in expenditures by DLOG on four drugs alone. Finally, based on the minimum, average, and maximum market price reductions, potential savings of up to BRL 3.9 billion were estimated for DLOG on the purchase of the nine medicines, if the patent terms were not extended.

Resumen: El párrafo único del art. 40 de la Ley de Propiedad Industrial brasileña establece la extensión de la vigencia de patentes, debido al retraso de su examen, garantizando al menos 10 años a partir de su concesión. Concebido como excepcional, este recurso se convirtió en una regla en el caso de las patentes farmacéuticas, prolongando el plazo de exclusividad de explotación de medicamentos. Esto impacta en el consumo privado y el presupuesto del Sistema Único de Salud de Brasil (SUS). Este trabajo investiga el coste para el SUS de la extensión de vigencia de nueve medicamentos, por estar prohibida la compra de versiones genéricas o biosimilares. Se analizaron tres grupos: (a) cuatro ya en extensión; (b) tres que, si fueran concedidas las patentes, tendrán extensión; y (c) dos con patentes mailbox que son de dominio público, pero pueden contar con una extensión garantizada judicialmente. A partir de valores unitarios, y cantidades totales de compra por parte del Departamento de Logística en Salud del Ministerio de la Salud (DLOG), se estimó un gasto total de BRL 10,6 billones con los nueve medicamentos de 2014 a 2018. De este modo, se proyectó el gasto total en los respectivos períodos de extensión: BRL 6,8 billones. Una búsqueda de mercado con precios de alternativas genéricas arrojó una reducción potencial de BRL 1,2 billón para el gasto del DLOG, con solo cuatro medicamentos. Finalmente, basándose en las reducciones mínimas, medias y máximas del mercado, se encontró un ahorro potencial de hasta BRL 3,9 billones en el gasto del DLOG con la compra de los nueve medicamentos, si no existiera un recurso de extensión de la vigencia.

Conceptos fundamentales de bioequivalencia y biosimilitud en la normativa chilena y controversias sobre intercambiabilidad / Chilean legislation on bioequivalence and biosimilarity and current controversies related to drug interchangeability

Los medicamentos constituyen un bien económico que forma parte del gasto público y privado y de la toma de decisiones en salud. El aseguramiento de su calidad, eficacia y seguridad resulta fundamental. Sin embargo, la variada oferta disponible en el mercado chileno, donde se reconocen productos innovadores y genéricos, constituye un escenario confuso para consumidores y proveedores en salud. En esta revisión pretendemos aclarar los conceptos de fármacos bioequivalentes (aplicable a compuestos de tamaño molecular pequeño) y fármacos biosimilares (para compuestos biológicos de mayor complejidad molecular). En ambos casos, el comportamiento en el organismo del principio activo debe ser demostrado mediante estudios realizados para este fin. Una aplicación directa del concepto de bioequivalencia es la intercambiabilidad, definida como la posibilidad de utilizar un producto de un mismo principio activo, mientras la forma farmacéutica y esquema de dosificación sean iguales. Las normas relativas a esta materia y los organismos públicos encargados, no solo debieran garantizar la seguridad y la eficacia en el intercambio entre productos, sino también aspectos relacionados con el costo, la accesibilidad a los fármacos y la implementación de una guía de homogeneización de conceptos y criterios de intercambiabilidad basados en la evidencia, lo cual impactaría en una mejor educación para los usuarios, reduciendo la asimetría de información entre el usuario y la industria. La importancia de la intercambiabilidad destaca en Chile en el contexto del Plan de Garantías Explícitas en Salud (GES) y la Ley de Protección Financiera para Diagnósticos y Tratamientos de Alto Costo en Salud (Ley Ricarte Soto). Sin embargo, no es posible garantizar que todos los productos alternativos al innovador presentes en el mercado chileno son bioequivalentes. El conocimiento disponible en esta temática puede impactar y contribuir a la toma de decisiones en los prescriptores y usuarios, así como en la elaboración de políticas públicas en torno a los productos farmacéuticos bioequivalentes y biosimilares en nuestro país.

Medicines are an economic good and a fundamental component of public and private health spending and decision-making. Assurance of their quality, efficiency, and safety is essential. In Chile, the wide variety of available drugs, including innovator products, and generics­some of which are certified as bioequivalent, while others are not­creates a potentially confusing scenario for both consumers and health providers. In this review, we intend to shed light on the concepts of bioequivalency (the standard permitting interchangeability for small-molecule drugs) and biosimilarity (the standard permitting interchangeability for biological compounds of greater molecular complexity). In both cases, how the active substance interacts with the host organism must be demonstrated by studies designed and carried out for this purpose. Interchangeability is defined as the possibility of using a product of the same active principle, as long as the pharmaceutical form and dosage scheme are the same. Regulations related to bioequivalence and biosimilarity must not only guarantee safety and efficacy when products are interchanged but also facilitate cost savings and access to medicines. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines that standardize concepts of interchangeability could lead to more educated usage and reduced information asymmetry between patients (users) and industry. Drug interchangeability is particularly relevant in two government health initiatives in Chile: the Explicit Guarantees in Health Care (GES) plan, and the Law on Financial Protection for High-Cost Diagnostics and Treatment in Health Care (also known as the "Ricarte Soto Law"). Nonetheless, it is not possible to guarantee that all alternative drug products on the Chilean market are bioequivalents of the reference product. Synthesis of the available knowledge on bioequivalent and biosimilar pharmaceutical products in Chile could facilitate and contribute to stakeholder decision-making and the development of better health policies.

Clinical and economic impact of generic versus brand name meropenem use in an intensive care unit in Colombia

Abstract Background: Recent studies suggest that sustained use of generic antibiotics may be associated with clinical failure and emergence of antibacterial resistance. The present study was designed to determine the clinical outcome between the use of generic meropenem (GM) and brand-name meropenem (BNM). Additionally, this study evaluated the economic impact of GM and BNM to determine if the former represents a cost-effective alternative to the latter. Methods: Patients treated between January 2011 and May 2014 received GM while patients treated between June 2014 and March 2017 received BNM. Mortality was compared between groups. Total infection cost was defined by the cost of antimicrobial consumption, length of stay, and laboratory and imaging exams until infection resolution. Findings: A total of 168 patients were included; survival rate for the 68 patients treated with GM was 38% compared to 59% in the patients treated with BNM. Multivariate analysis showed that the variables most strongly-associated with mortality were cardiovascular disease (OR 18.18, 95% CI 1.25-262.3, p = 0.033) and treatment with generic meropenem (OR 18.45, 95% CI 1.45-232.32, p = 0.024). On the other hand, total infection cost did not show a significant difference between groups (BNM $10,771 vs. GM $11,343; p = 0.91). Interpretation: The present study suggests that patients treated with GM have a risk of death 18 times higher compared to those treated with BNM. Furthermore, economic analysis shows that GM is not more cost effective than BNM. Summary: More studies measuring clinical outcomes are needed to confirm the clinical equivalence of brand-name versus generic antibiotics, not only for meropenem but also for other molecules.

Efectividad y seguridad del esquema genérico lamivudina/tenofovir y efavirenz en pacientes con VIH/SIDA naïve: estudio fase IV no aleatorizado, Cali-Colombia 2012-2014 / Effectiveness and safety of generic version of lamivudine/tenofovir and efavirenz in treatment naïve HIV-infected patients: a nonrandomized, open-label, phase IV study in Cali-Colombia, 2012-2014

Resumen Antecedentes: Los estudios clínicos orientados a evaluar la calidad de medicamentos genéricos pueden ser útiles para fortalecer políticas de acceso a terapia anti-retroviral combinada (TARc). Objetivo: Describir la efectividad y seguridad del esquema genérico lamivudina/tenofovir/efavirenz (3TC/TDF/EFV) en pacientes con infección por VIH/SIDA naïve, pertenecientes a un programa de atención integral. Materiales/Métodos: Estudio clínico prospectivo fase IV abierto y sin grupo control. Entre 2012-2014, se incluyeron y siguieron 40 pacientes con infección por VIH/SIDA naïve y con indicación para iniciar tratamiento. Los pacientes fueron tratados con el esquema genérico 3TC/TDF/EFV y fueron seguidos durante 12 meses. El seguimiento incluyó valoración clínica, parámetros inmunovirológicos y de laboratorio, al inicio del tratamiento y a los 3, 6 y 12 meses. Resultados: De los 40 pacientes, 30 (75%) cumplieron los doce meses de tratamiento; de ellos, 80% alcanzó CV indetectable (< 40 copias/mL) y 83,3% CV < 50 copias/mL. Adicionalmente, en el grupo hubo un incremento en la mediana de 173 linfocitos TCD4/mm3. Por su parte, los resultados del hemograma completo, creatininemia y transaminasas hepáticas se conservaron en rangos normales y no generaron cambios del TARc. Los efectos adversos reconocidos para estos medicamentos se presentaron en menos de 10% de los pacientes y no tuvieron implicaciones graves. Conclusiones: En este grupo pequeño de pacientes, el esquema genérico 3TC/TDF/EFV es efectivo y seguro en el tratamiento de pacientes con infección por VIH/SIDA naïve, y su perfil de efectividad y seguridad es similar al del esquema 3TC/TDF/EFV innovador en pacientes con condiciones clínicas similares.

Background: Clinical studies aimed to evaluating the quality of generic drugs may be useful to strengthen policies of access to combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). Aim: To describe the effectiveness and safety of the generic schema lamivudine/tenofovir/efavirenz (3TC/TDF/EFV) in patients with HIV/AIDS naive, belonging to a comprehensive care program. Methods: A nonrandomized, open-label, phase IV study, during 2012 to 2014 naive HIV-infected patients 18 years or older with indication to receive cART were recruited. Patients were treated with generic scheme 3TC/TDF/EFV and were followed-up during 12 months. Clinical, immunological and laboratory parameters were assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. Results: Of the 40 patients, 30 (75%) met the 12 months of treatment; of them, 80% achieved undetectable viral load (< 40 copies/mL) and 83.3% viral load < 50 copies/mL. Additionally, there was a significant increase (173 cells/mm3) in the median for CD4 T lymphocyte count. Moreover, the results of the whole blood count, creatinine and transaminases were preserved in normal ranges and did not generate changes in the cART. Potential side effects of antiretroviral drugs occurred in less than 10% of patients and had no serious implications. Conclusions: In this small group of patients, the generic scheme 3TC/TDF/EFV is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with HIV/AIDS naïve, and its effectiveness and safety profile is similar to show by innovator scheme 3TC/TDF/EFV in patients with similar clinical conditions. Registro Estudio: Registro Público Cubano de Ensayos Clínicos (RPCEC) ID: RPCEC00000134. Registered 20 July 2012.

Brazilian generics market change after Farmácia Popular program

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate trends in the use of generic and non-generic medicines to treat hypertension and diabetes under the Farmácia Popular Program (FP) and its impact on generic medicines sales volume and market share in the Brazilian pharmaceutical market. METHODS This longitudinal, retrospective study used interrupted time series design to analyze changes in monthly sales volume and proportion of medicines sales (market share) for oral antidiabetic and antihypertensive medicines for generic versus non-generic products. Analyses were conducted in a combined dataset that aggregate monthly sales volumes from the Farmácia Popular program and from the QuintilesIMS™ (IQVIA) national market sales data from January 2007 to December 2012. The Farmácia Popular program phases analyzed included: a) 2009 reductions in medicines reference prices (AFP-II) and b) 2011 implementation of free medicines program for hypertension and diabetes, the Saúde não tem preço (SNTP - Health has no price). RESULTS Patterns of use for FP-covered antidiabetic and antihypertensive medicines were similar to their use in the market in general. After one year of the decreases in government subsidies in April 2010, market share of antidiabetic and antihypertensive medicines experienced relative declines of -54.5% and -59.9%, respectively. However, when FP-covered medicines were made free to patients, overall market volume for antidiabetic and antihypertensive generics increased dramatically, with 242.6% and 277.0% relative increases by February 2012, as well as non-generics with relative increase of 209.7% and 279% for antidiabetic and antihypertensive medicines, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Ministry of Health policies on the amount of patient cost sharing and on the choice of medicines on coverage lists have substantial impacts on overall generic sales volume in retail pharmacies.

Intercambialidade de produtos biológicos no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS): principais desafios regulatórios / Interchangeability of biological products in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS): the main regulatory challenges / Intercambiabilidad de productos biológicos en el Sistema Único de Salud (SUS): principales desafíos regulatorios

Resumo: Produtos biológicos revolucionaram a terapêutica mundial. O alto custo desses medicamentos, no entanto, ameaça a sustentabilidade dos sistemas de saúde. O desenvolvimento de cópias é tido como uma alternativa econômica, mas devido à complexidade desses produtos, muitos conceitos utilizados para os medicamentos genéricos não se aplicam. A intercambialidade entre produtos biológicos representa um desafio regulatório a ser superado. Este ensaio discute os principais desafios regulatórios relacionados ao estabelecimento de critérios para intercambialidade entre produtos biológicos novos e suas cópias no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), considerando as diretrizes adotadas pelas principais agências reguladoras de medicamentos do mundo sobre a intercambialidade e o arcabouço regulatório vigente no Brasil para esta questão. Preocupações relacionadas à intercambialidade de produtos biológicos incluem substituição automática, nomenclatura, farmacovigilância, imunogenicidade e extrapolação das indicações terapêuticas e dos dados clínicos de produtos biológicos novos para suas cópias. Embora o sucesso clínico e os benefícios econômicos da alternância entre alguns produtos biológicos novos e seus biossimilares já tenham sido observados, a heterogeneidade das barreiras regulatórias para aprovação das cópias de produtos biológicos entre diferentes países deve ser considerada para a regulamentação da intercambialidade de produtos biológicos no Brasil.

Abstract: Biological products have sparked a worldwide therapeutic revolution. However, the high cost of these products threatens health systems' sustainability. The development of copies is considered an economic alternative, but due to the products' complexity, many concepts used in generic drugs do not apply. Interchangeability between biologicals poses a regulatory challenge. This essay discusses the main regulatory challenges for establishing criteria for interchangeability between new biologicals and their copies in the scope of the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS), considering the guidelines adopted by the world's main drug regulatory agencies concerning interchangeability and the prevailing Brazilian regulatory framework on this issue. Concerns related to the interchangeability of biologicals include automatic substitution, nomenclature, pharmacovigilance, immunogenicity, and extrapolation of therapeutic indications and clinical data from new biologicals to their copies. While the clinical success and economic benefits of switching from new biologicals to their biosimilars have already been observed, the heterogeneity between countries in the regulatory barriers to the approval of copies of biologicals should be taken into consideration during the regulation of interchangeability of biologicals in Brazil.

Resumen: Los productos biológicos revolucionaron la terapéutica mundial. El alto coste de estos medicamentos, no obstante, amenaza la sostenibilidad de los sistemas de salud. El desarrollo de copias se considera como una alternativa económica, pero debido a la complejidad de estos productos, muchos conceptos utilizados para los medicamentos genéricos no se aplican a los mismos. La intercambiabilidad entre productos biológicos representa un desafío regulatorio que se debe superar. Este trabajo discute los principales desafíos regulatorios, relacionados con el establecimiento de criterios para la intercambiabilidad entre productos biológicos nuevos y sus copias en el ámbito del Sistema Único de Salud (SUS), considerando las directrices adoptadas por las principales agencias regulatorias de medicamentos del mundo sobre la intercambiabilidad y el armazón regulatorio vigente en Brasil para esta cuestión. Las preocupaciones relacionadas con la intercambiabilidad de productos biológicos incluyen la sustitución automática, nomenclatura, farmacovigilancia, inmunogenicidad y extrapolación de las indicaciones terapéuticas, así como de los datos clínicos de productos biológicos nuevos para sus copias. A pesar de que el éxito clínico y los beneficios económicos de la alternancia entre algunos productos biológicos nuevos y sus biosimilares, ya se han observados, la heterogeneidad de las barreras regulatorias para la aprobación de las copias de productos biológicos entre los diferentes países debe ser considerada para la regulación de la intercambiabilidad de productos biológicos en Brasil.

Percepción de la población con respecto a medicamentos genéricos frente a los de marca en hospitales del Perú / The population's perceptions of generic drugs compared to original brand-name drugs in Peruvian hospitals / Percepção da população a respeito dos medicamentos genéricos frente aos de marca em hospitais do Peru

Resumen: El objetivo del estudio fue conocer la percepción de la población con respecto a medicamentos genéricos, frente a los medicamentos de marca, en hospitales del Perú. Participaron del estudio 4.914 personas mayores de 18 años, de 13 ciudades del Perú; clasificándolas en Lima, grandes y pequeñas ciudades. Se exploraron características socioeconómicas, demográficas y de percepción de medicamentos genéricos, en comparación con los medicamentos de marca. Determinando las asociaciones para cada cruce de variables, se calcularon razones de prevalencias (RP) y sus intervalos del 95% de confianza (IC95%), usando regresiones de Poisson crudas y ajustadas con varianza robusta con Stata 14.0. De los 4.914 participantes, el 46,7% estaban de acuerdo con que los medicamentos genéricos son menos eficaces que los medicamentos de marca, el 49,3% ha recomendado o recomendaría a otras personas el uso de medicamentos genéricos, además, el análisis multivariado encontró que las personas que tenían un ingreso económico menor a PEN 1.000 estaban predispuestas a recomendar un medicamento genérico (RP = 1,36; IC95%: 1,14-1,63). Los resultados ponen en manifiesto que la población peruana aún tiene conceptos equívocos y baja aceptación a los medicamentos genéricos. El presente estudio debería servir para desarrollar políticas de salud, que velen por el bajo costo y calidad a la hora de escoger un medicamento.

Abstract: The study aimed to investigate the population's perceptions of generic drugs compared to original brand-name drugs in Peruvian hospitals. Participation included 4,914 persons 18 years and older in 13 cities in Peru, categorized as Lima, large cities, and small cities. The study explored socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and perceptions of generics in comparison to brand-name drugs. In determining the associations for each intersection of variables, the authors calculated the prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), using crude and adjusted Poisson regression with robust variance with Stata 14.0. Of the 4,914 participants, 46.7% felt that generics are less effective than brand-name drugs and 49.3% had recommended or would recommend generics to other people; multivariate analysis showed that individuals with income less than PEN 1,000 (USD 300) were prone to recommending a generic drug (PR = 1.36; 95%CI: 1.14-1.63). The results indicate that the Peruvian population still has mistaken concepts and low acceptance of generic drugs, and the study should serve to develop health policies that ensure low cost and quality when choosing medicines.

Resumo: O objetivo do estudo foi conhecer a percepção da população a respeito dos medicamentos genéricos frente aos medicamentos de marca em hospitais do Peru. Participaram 4.914 pessoas maiores de 18 anos, de 13 cidades do Peru; foram classificadas em Lima, além de grandes e pequenas cidades. Foram exploradas as características socioeconômicas, demográficas e de percepção de medicamentos genéricos em comparação com os medicamentos de marca. Determinando as associações para cada intersecção de variáveis, foram calculadas as razões de prevalências (RP) e seus intervalos de 95% de confiança (IC95%), usando regressões de Poisson brutas e ajustadas com variância robusta com Stata 14.0. Dos 4.914 participantes, um 46,7% estavam de acordo com que os medicamentos genéricos são menos eficazes do que os medicamentos de marca, um 49,3% tem recomendado o recomendaria a outras pessoas o uso de medicamentos genéricos, além disso, a análise multivariada encontrou que as pessoas que tinham um ingresso econômico menor a PEN 1.000 eram propensas a recomendar um medicamento genérico (RP = 1,36; IC95%: 1,14-1,63). Os resultados manifestam que a população peruana ainda tem conceitos equívocos e baixa aceitação dos medicamentos genéricos, e o presente estudo deveria servir para desenvolver políticas de saúde, que assegurem o baixo custo e a qualidade na hora de escolher um medicamento.

An assessment of infant medication administration and storage practices in selected communities in the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province, South Africa

Background: Effective infant medication administration and storage is a major public health challenge outlined by the World Health Organization. These challenges may be exacerbated in rural or limited-resource areas. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate infant medication administration and storage practices. Setting: This study took place in selected communities in the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Method: Data was collected through 39 semi-structured interviews with infant caretakers and rural health workers. Interviews were recorded when permission was given by participants. Interviews were transcribed and coded using grounded theory and Tesch's model of data analysis. Themes were agreed upon through consensus discussions with the researchers and an independent coder. Results: Six themes that affect current infant medication administration and storage practices in the Vhembe District were identified: access to infant healthcare, the role of health workers, the devices used in the administration of infant medication, reluctance of the infant to take the medication, storage and reuse of infant medication in the rural home and hygiene practices surrounding infant medication administration. Conclusions: Many factors were found to affect infant medication administration and storage practices in in the Vhembe District. Substantial evidence was found to suggest that the relationship between rural health workers and infant caretakers strongly influences these practices: a great amount of reliance and trust is placed in the health worker. Ensuring proper dosage of infant medication in the rural household arose as a main concern of participants. Reuse of medication in the home and home hygiene practices surrounding infant medication administration are areas of potential future research. This future research may further inform recommendations for infant medication administration and storage practices in the Vhembe District

Utilización de dos antibióticos genéricos en un hospital de tercer nivel en Bogotá / Drug utilization study of two generic antibiotics in a tertiary hospital in Bogotá

Resumen Introducción. La política farmacéutica de Colombia establece la necesidad de intensificar la investigación en farmacoepidemiología a nivel nacional, especialmente en el caso de los antibióticos. Objetivo. Aportar información farmacoepidemiológica en cuanto a la efectividad, las condiciones de uso y la seguridad de la cefepima y el meropenem genéricos en un hospital de alta complejidad en Bogotá. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio descriptivo, longitudinal y retrospectivo sobre la utilización de estos medicamentos. Los datos se recolectaron de todas las historias clínicas en las cuales se registraba el uso de cefepima y meropenem. Resultados. Se incluyeron 82 pacientes tratados con cefepima y 91 con meropenem. La mayoría de ellos había estado internada en servicios diferentes a la unidad de cuidados intensivos (59,8 % con cefepima y 52,7 % con meropenem). El 21,9 % de los tratados con cefepima y el 49 % de los tratados con meropenem, tuvieron consulta con un infectólogo, en tanto que en 47 % de los primeros y en 78 % de los segundos, se hizo cultivo o antibiograma. Las condiciones más frecuentemente tratadas con cefepima fueron las infecciones de vías respiratorias (32,5 %) y, con meropenem, las infecciones genitourinarias (34,8 %). Las tasas de éxito terapéutico fueron de 61,7 % para la cefepima y de 63,0 % para el meropenem. Conclusiones. Este estudio aporta información sobre el desempeño terapéutico de dos antibióticos genéricos de uso hospitalario. No hubo reportes de falla terapéutica durante el periodo de estudio. En los casos en que no hubo respuesta al tratamiento, las causas frecuentes fueron las alteraciones farmacocinéticas, las condiciones clínicas desfavorables y la elección inadecuada del tratamiento antimicrobiano.

Abstract Introduction: The Colombian national pharmaceutical policy establishes as a strategy the generation of greater pharmaco-epidemiological research at the national level, especially in the case of antibiotic drugs. Objective: To provide local pharmaco-epidemiological evidence regarding the effectiveness, conditions of use and safety of generic meropenem and cefepime in a tertiary hospital in Bogotá. Materials and methods: We conducted a descriptive, longitudinal and retrospective drug utilization study. The data were collected from the medical histories of all the patients who had cefepime or meropenem prescribed. Results: We included 82 patients treated with cefepime and 91 treated with meropenem in the study. Most of the patients were in services different from the intensive care unit (taking cefepime: 59.8%, and meropenem: 52.7%). Only 21.9% of the patients treated with cefepime and 49% of those treated with meropenem were seen by an infectious disease specialist. The antibiogram was performed for 47% and 60% of the patients treated with cefepime and meropenem, respectively. The most frequent indication for cefepime were respiratory infections and for meropenem, genitourinary ones. Therapeutic success rates were 61.7% for cefepime and 63.0% for meropenem. Conclusions: This study contributes evidence regarding the therapeutic performance of two generic antibiotics used in tertiary hospitals. There were no reports of therapeutic failure during the study period. In the cases of non-response, pharmacokinetic alterations, unfavorable clinical conditions, and inappropriate choice of antimicrobial treatment were identified as frequent factors.